The Gunkatta Review
What are the most common materials used in photovoltaic cells?
When you ask about the most common materials in photovoltaic cells, the immediate and dominant answer is crystalline silicon, which currently powers over 95% of the global solar panel market. This isn't just a slight preference; it's a near-total market domination built on decades of refinement, abundant raw material supply, and a powerful balance of efficiency, durability, and cost. However, to think the landscape is monolithic would be a mistake. A vibrant ecosystem of alternative and emerging materials, from thin-film compounds to experimental perovskites, is crucial for specific applications and future innovation. The choice of material fundamentally dictates a solar cell's performance characteristics, manufacturing process, cost profile, and ideal deployment scenario.
Let's break down the silicon family first, as it's the bedrock of the industry. We primarily deal with two types: monocrystalline and polycrystalline silicon. Monocrystalline silicon (mono-Si) is grown as a single, continuous crystal structure, typically using the Czochralski process. This uniformity gives it the highest commercial efficiencies, routinely in the 20-24% range for premium modules. You can identify these panels by their uniform dark color and rounded cell edges. The process is energy-intensive and results in silicon waste, but the high efficiency and excellent space performance make it the go-to for residential rooftops and projects where area is limited. Polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si) is made by melting raw silicon fragments together in a mold. The resulting multi-crystal structure is less uniform, leading to slightly lower efficiencies, generally between 15-20%. Its manufacturing is simpler and cheaper, with less waste, giving it a historic cost advantage. The panels have a distinctive blue, speckled appearance. While its market share has decreased in favor of mono-Si due to falling price differentials and the demand for higher power density, it remains a significant player.
The journey from raw quartz sand to a functional silicon wafer is a marvel of modern engineering. It involves purifying silica to metallurgical-grade silicon (98-99% pure), then further refining it via the Siemens process or fluidized bed reactors into hyper-pure polysilicon (99.9999% pure, or "six nines"). This polysilicon is then melted and crystallized into ingots, which are sliced into wafers using diamond-wire saws—a process where minimizing kerf loss (the material turned into dust during cutting) is a constant battle for cost reduction. Recent advancements like PERC (Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell) technology, which adds a dielectric passivation layer to the rear of the cell, have pushed silicon efficiencies closer to their theoretical limits. Even newer architectures like TOPCon (Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact) and HJT (Heterojunction Technology) are now entering mass production, offering potential pathways to efficiencies above 25% for commercial cells.
Beyond the silicon giant, the thin-film sector offers materials with completely different properties and advantages. These are not wafer-based; instead, they involve depositing layers of photovoltaic material, often just a few micrometers thick, onto a substrate like glass, metal, or plastic. This allows for flexibility, lightweight designs, and lower temperature manufacturing. The major commercial thin-film contenders are:
- Cadmium Telluride (CdTe): This is the second most prevalent PV technology globally after silicon, holding a market share of about 5%. Companies like First Solar have perfected its manufacturing. CdTe modules have lower peak efficiencies than silicon (around 18-22% for champion modules, 16-19% for commercial), but they excel in real-world conditions like high temperatures and low light. Their temperature coefficient is superior to silicon, meaning they lose less output on a hot day. The use of cadmium, a toxic heavy metal, is managed through sealed modules and robust end-of-life recycling programs mandated by manufacturers.
- Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS): A more complex compound, CIGS holds the efficiency record for thin-film cells in the lab at over 23%. It offers a good balance of efficiency, flexibility, and a lighter environmental footprint in production compared to silicon. However, the complexity of co-evaporating or sputtering four elements uniformly over large areas has historically challenged its cost-competitiveness at scale, though niche applications in building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) and portable power are strong.
- Amorphous Silicon (a-Si): An early thin-film entrant, a-Si uses a non-crystalline form of silicon. Its efficiencies are low (6-10%), and it suffers from light-induced degradation (the Staebler-Wronski effect). Its primary use today is in small consumer electronics like calculators and garden lights, where ultra-low cost and minimal power needs are the drivers.
To visualize the core differences, here's a comparative snapshot:
| Material | Type | Avg. Module Efficiency | Key Advantages | Key Challenges/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monocrystalline Si | Wafer-based | 20-24% | Highest efficiency, long lifespan (>25 yrs), space-efficient | Higher cost, energy-intensive production |
| Polycrystalline Si | Wafer-based | 15-20% | Lower cost per watt (historically), simpler process | Lower efficiency & heat tolerance |
| Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) | Thin-film | 16-19% | Low-cost manufacturing, excellent high-temp performance, low light response | Use of toxic Cd, lower peak efficiency |
| CIGS | Thin-film | 12-16% (comm.) | High thin-film efficiency potential, flexible substrates | Complex manufacturing, supply chain for In & Ga |
Now, let's talk about the future. The lab is buzzing with materials that could redefine the next generation. Perovskite solar cells are the undisputed superstar of PV research. Named for their specific crystal structure, these materials are synthesized from abundant elements and can be printed or coated from liquid inks at near room temperature. Their efficiency has skyrocketed from 3.8% in 2009 to over 25% in lab cells today—a pace of improvement unmatched in PV history. They offer the potential for ultra-low-cost, lightweight, and even semi-transparent panels. The catch? Stability. Early perovskites degraded rapidly when exposed to moisture, heat, and light. Intensive global research is focused on encapsulation and compositional engineering (mixing different cations and anions) to solve this, with some promising results showing thousands of hours of operational stability. The most likely near-term application is in perovskite-silicon tandem cells, where a perovskite top cell captures high-energy photons and a silicon bottom cell captures the rest, pushing theoretical efficiencies beyond 30%. Several companies are now moving towards pilot production of these tandem cells.
Other advanced concepts are also in play. III-V multijunction cells, made from expensive materials like Gallium Arsenide (GaAs), hold the absolute world record for efficiency at over 47% under concentrated sunlight. Their astronomical cost confines them to niche markets like satellites and military drones. Organic photovoltaics (OPV), using carbon-based polymers, promise extreme flexibility and low environmental impact but are still grappling with low efficiencies (around 10-12% in labs) and longevity issues. Quantum dot solar cells, which use nanoscale semiconductor particles, are another exploratory avenue, offering the ability to "tune" the cell to absorb specific wavelengths of light by simply changing the dot size.
The material choice isn't just about physics and efficiency; it's deeply intertwined with economics and sustainability. Silicon's dominance is reinforced by a colossal, global supply chain and continuous process innovation that drives the celebrated Swanson's Law (the learning curve that has seen module prices drop about 24% for every doubling of cumulative shipped volume). The energy payback time—the time a panel must operate to generate the energy used to create it—is now often less than two years for silicon panels, and even shorter for thin-film like CdTe. End-of-life management is becoming a critical part of the material conversation. Silicon panels are largely made of glass, aluminum, and silicon, all of which are recyclable, but the process of separating the laminated layers is currently economic only at scale. Dedicated recycling initiatives are ramping up globally. For thin-film, the recovery of valuable materials like tellurium and indium, and the safe containment of cadmium, are key drivers for closed-loop recycling systems.
When you're evaluating which material is "best," the context is everything. For a utility-scale solar farm on abundant desert land, the lower cost per watt of large-format monocrystalline or CdTe modules might be decisive. For a residential roof with limited space, the higher efficiency of premium monocrystalline PERC or HJT panels maximizes energy yield. For an integrated façade on a curved building, flexible CIGS might be the only viable option. The evolution of photovoltaic cells is a story of this material diversity. While silicon will remain the workhorse for the foreseeable future due to its unbeatable combination of scale, performance, and reliability, the innovation in thin-film and next-gen materials ensures that solar technology will continue to adapt, improve, and find new applications. This multi-material approach is essential to drive the global transition to renewable energy, meeting different needs from massive power plants to wearable chargers.
Skip the algorithm. Get the Weekly Watchlist.
74,200 Insiders read it first. Six hand-picked titles, scored across 9 Indian languages, every Friday morning. Editorially curated by humans, never sold to a platform.
Get the Weekly Watchlist